The Myth of American Empire

Again and again I run into people on the right and left sides of the political fringe who hold to the bizarre idea that the United States has some sort of international empire because we have troops deployed overseas. While I agree that we have far too many troops in other countries and could save a lot of money in these hard times by bringing some of them home, these deployments certainly don’t seem to fit the characteristics you would expect of troops who are part of an international empire.

The common claim is that we have “700 bases in 130 countries”. That’s almost as many countries as there are member states in the United Nations. Now, the definition of an empire is one nation exercising economic, political and military control over another. If these troops were deployed for that purpose, their role would presumably be to control the governments of those 130 countries, keep the civilian population under control, and protect the vast administrative network of our empire.

Yet if you look at what our troops are doing overseas you see something very different. Conveniently the Heritage Foundation has compiled historical data on our overseas troop deployments. Foreign Policy in Focus also provides some useful information in a recent report.

The first problem is that to get to this popular figure of “700 bases in 130 countries,” you have to cumulatively add up all of the deployments of the last 50 years and count extremely small deployments and minor facilities which are considered bases even when they have no actual military personnel stationed at them. You have to count as “bases” the the contingents of marine guards at 165 US embassies and smaller consular offices and such things as the hundreds military golf courses, movie theaters, post exchange shops and other recreational facilities. In fact, if you count all the facilities considered “bases” and all the embassies you get about 860 bases in 165 countries, so the popular figures are a bit out of date.

The truth is that most of these deployments are not really military in character and at any given time the number of significant deployments is much smaller. 20 men guarding an embassy are not building an empire. When you look at deployments of 1000 men or more, you find that there are currently fewer than 20 countries hosting deployments of that size. When you look at deployments of 100-1000 men you find that there are fewer than 30. So rather than 130 countries with significant numbers of US troops in them there are actually only about 40, mostly in Europe and parts of Asia. What’s more, rather than building an empire, these numbers have been steadily declining, and are about half what they were in the 1950s.

In addition, all of these large deployments are the result of mutual defense arrangements which date back for decades where our troops are there at the invitation of and with the cooperation of the local government. The overwhelming majority of our troops are deployed in coordination with the United Nations or NATO or by arrangement with a few major allies like Germany, England and Japan. In many cases, rather than representing some sort of mythical US empire, they are often deployed on behalf of extra-national groups or programs or working in coordination with local forces.

In fact, a great many of these American troops deployed overseas are not even involved in normal military activities, but are engaged in various humanitarian aid programs. In 2006 the US military took part in 556 relief efforts in 99 countries. These efforts on behalf of various international organizations are a major deployment, but they are hardly empire building. They’re things like aiding victims of natural disasters and distributing food aid and medicine in troubled places like Haiti, Georgia and Somalia. Rather than oppressing these nations with our imperial rule, these missions are enormously popular and poll results in disaster-ravaged countries like Indonesia show a substantial increase in pro-American sentiment as a result of our humanitarian activities there.

Yes, we almost certainly have far too many overseas facilities, too many men deployed outside our own borders and are spending way too much money on these efforts. Right now we have about 400,000 troops deployed outside of the US and only about half of them are involved in peacekeeping in Iraq or the war in Afghanistan. Some of the remainder provide support services, but the truth is that we really don’t need 200,000 or more men in Europe and Japan and other friendly countries. In times of economic hardship we could save a lot of money by closing some of those bases. In fact, substantial closures of overseas bases were carried out by the Bush administration and the total number of bases overseas has been reduced over the last 20 years from over 1000 to under 800.

Our overseas military installations and deployments are generally not engaged in anything imperial in character.. An empire is not defined by a bunch of troops engaged in humanitarian aid, peacekeeping and security work. It is defined by economic, political and military control of other countries. To have an empire we would need to be controlling and administering foreign territories, running their governments and profiting from their economies, resources and industrial production. While the United States has a nominal presence in hundreds of countries and troops spread far and wide, with facilities to support them, with the exception of the occasional wartime deployment, the overwhelming role of American forces overseas is to provide aid and support and to fulfill treaty obligations and help our allies. Embassy guards, hospital ships, food distribution centers and golf courses are not conquering or plundering or oppressing anyone.

So by all means, let’s close as many overseas bases and bring back as many troops as we can, but let’s do it for the right reasons, not because of the delusion that the United States is an empire.

Digg!

About Dave 536 Articles
Dave Nalle has worked as a magazine editor, a freelance writer, a capitol hill staffer, a game designer and taught college history for many years. He now designs fonts for a living and lives with his family in a small town just outside Austin where he is ex-president of the local Lions Club. He is on the board of the Republican Liberty Caucus and Politics Editor of Blogcritics Magazine. You can find his writings about fonts, art and graphic design at The Scriptorium. He also runs a conspiracy debunking site at IdiotWars.com.

29 Comments

  1. Darn it all Demeur, I thought you were in my feed reeadr, but you weren’t. I’ve got some catching up to do. I was wondering why I didn’t remember seeing anything from you lately. lolYou’re in my reeadr now…

  2. Hello there! This blog post could not be written much better!
    Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He continually kept talking about this. I am going to
    send this information to him. Pretty sure he’s
    going to have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  3. ちょっとちょうどあなたに素早く頭を与えたいと思いました。 |あなたはテキストの単語 ポストに画面をオフに実行されているように見えるすなわち。問題またはブラウザとは何か|これはフォーマット形式である場合、私はわからないの互換性が、私は考え私はあなたが知っているようにポストと思います。 スタイルとデザインしかし見栄え!すぐに | 問題問題あなたが得る願っています。 おかげで
    国内即発 当店の商品全て正規品 http://zrownowazonypies.pl

  4. こんにちはこんにちは私はそうです幸せ私はあなたのブログのページを発見、私は本当に のための何か他のもの、とにかくのため素晴らしいポストとオールラウンドスリリングブログ(私もテーマ/デザインを愛して)楽しま、私は読み取りますこれですべての瞬間私は保存持っていることを、また、に追加あなたのRSSフィード、私は時間があるときに、私は素晴らしいを読むために戻ってきますはるか 仕事}以上、{素晴らしいを維持ください。
    国内即発 格安 激安 http://gallery-fortyone.com

  5. すごい迫力! ブログサイトこのテンプレート/テーマを私は本当に です。それは、シンプルでありながら効果的です。多くの時間、それはだ非常に困難なハード ユーザビリティ素晴らしい使い勝手と外観との間の「完璧なバランス」ことを取得します。これで仕事優れた偉大な素晴らしいを行って、私は言わなければなりません。ブログの負荷スーパー、クイックの私のためサファリ も。 極上ブログ!
    国内即発 最安値に挑戦 http://testpointconsultores.com

  6. ニースポスト。 日々の日常 私のStumbleUponの上で挑戦的な|私は全く新しい何か新しいことを学びます。他から| 記事内容 作家 と実践 介して読み取ることが読み エキサイティングな面白い からのウェブサイト|ウェブサイト|その他} {サイトから。
    中古 激安 国内即発 http://escortmagazin.net

  7. その興味深い | あなたはあなたがしています! 私はありません 私は本当にした と思うと仮定 もの のようにそのの前に。だから素晴らしい 見つける 人思考この問題。これを起動本当に .. に感謝をしていただきありがとうございます。 このウェブサイトは | ことが要求される ものですが、一つのことである インターネット上で、少しを持つ人一部でオリジナリティのビットを持ちます!
    国内即発 ランキング http://voyagezenfrance.com

  8. あなたの 変更|あなたはの思想とみなさ場合ブログをサイト | 好奇心の不思議私はでしたか?その非常によく書かれました。私はyouveは言うようになったものが大好きです。しかし、多分あなたは少しより多くのコンテンツのように、人々はそれとのより良い接続することができることができるように。または 2 写真 |ホードは、1 1は持っていることのためのテキストの非常に多くを得ました。たぶん、あなたは宇宙、それをより良いだろうか?
    メール便送料無料 商品到着後レビュー記載でプレゼント http://www.ma3productions.com

  9. あなたのレイアウトに|あなたのライティングスキルなどともに感心| 本当に非常 | 私は私は。それは自分|これは支払わテーマであるか、変更カスタマイズしましたか? とにかく 今日では、これらの日このようなブログ| 素晴らしい素敵を見にまれ| | それはそれはだ、品質の書き込み優れた素敵を追いつきます。
    人気急上昇 商品到着後レビュー記載でプレゼント http://edlelectrical.com.au

  10. この上 |スパム問題問題を持っています。私もブロガーだ、と私はあった好奇心あなたの状況を、 我々は 作成しているいくつかの素晴らしい手続きと我々は見ているのスワップと戦略 他の人々興味があれば| 電子メール、電子メール、私は撃つ理由は。
    安心の国内発送 商品到着後レビュー記載でプレゼント http://www.cybergraphik.co.uk

  11. ご挨拶!私が尋ねるはずと考えたのだが、私はこれはちょっとオフトピックです知っています。リンクまたは多分ゲスト|あなたはの取引交換に興味がある書き込み ポストまたはその逆?私と同じ多くのサイト カバー トピックをあなたと私は考えるとして、我々は非常にお互いに利益を得ることができます。場合は興味が送るまでお気軽に私あなたがしているあなたは可能性があります。あなたからの便りを楽しみにしています! グレート経由でブログ!
    メール便送料無料 姉妹品も人気上昇中 http://www.villaverde2.com.br

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*