Forced Vaccination: A Simple Question

The Obama administration is considering forced vaccination of children and adults in response to the possibility of a swine flu epidemic this fall.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has been preparing public school superintendents for the possibility that their schools will be used by the government as inoculation centers for a nationwide swine flu vaccination program which may include mandatory vaccination of public school students who are already required to receive several other government mandated vaccinations.

While there is a genuine threat of a swine flu pandemic, it does not justify the level of fearmongering being engaged in by the Obama Administration at a time which makes it look very much as if they are using this issue to advance their health care agenda. Although numbers like 90,000 deaths and 1.2 million hospitalizations from the CDC seem frightening, they fall within the parameters for the effects of the yearly outbreaks of other kinds of flu.

There is no legitimate reason for any program of forced mass vaccination, especially directed at school children and using state mandated public education requirements as a threat to force parents to comply. Mandatory vaccination programs are a violation of the constitutionally guaranteed right to privacy and personal security. It is especially important that the rights of children and the rights of their parents to make decisions about their childrens’ welfare be protected.

Here in Texas we saw an attempt at forced vaccination when Governor Rick Perry tried to mandate that all teenage girls be given the Human Paphaloma Virus vaccine at a cost of over $400 per vaccination to the taxpayers. Outrage over the huge tax cost of the program was exceeded only by anger over having this vaccine forced on teenagers. Protests were so effective that the program was killed. Now we need to do the same on a nationwide basis.

The issue of vaccination – in fact the entire healthcare debate – comes down to one very simple question. Who should make the healthcare decisions for you and your family? Should it be you or should it be legislators or commissions of nameless and faceless government bureaucrats like those created by proposed healthcare legislation.

This issue is so important and so personal that giving up control to government is terrifying. As a result, we are seeing massive nationwide grassroots protests against government run healthcare because whatever the faults of the current system, people want to keep control and make their own health care decisions.

Vaccines are one of the great advancements of modern medicine and for the most part they are safe and important for protecting children and adults from real health threats. Nonetheless it is still morally wrong for government to force any kind of choice like this on citizens against their will. Government should protect freedom of choice, not take it away.

The Republican Liberty Caucus is working to oppose both so-called healthcare reform and mandated vaccination programs. Citizens have the right to make their own health care decisions, including opting out of current school vaccination requirements and not being forced to comply with any future government inoculation program.

Citizens should be trusted to make responsible decisions about the health of their family members and the safety of the community. The role of the government should be to protect citizens and their rights, not to make medical decisions for them without their consent.

So I ask again, who do you want making your health care decisions?


About Dave 534 Articles
Dave Nalle has worked as a magazine editor, a freelance writer, a capitol hill staffer, a game designer and taught college history for many years. He now designs fonts for a living and lives with his family in a small town just outside Austin where he is ex-president of the local Lions Club. He is on the board of the Republican Liberty Caucus and Politics Editor of Blogcritics Magazine. You can find his writings about fonts, art and graphic design at The Scriptorium. He also runs a conspiracy debunking site at


  1. I don’t get it… Dave rants and cries about “conspiracies” yet gets on board with the forced vaccines? Wow! Little does he seem to know that us “conspiracy” buffs (i.e. those that read the news) are on the same page as he on this one. Scary thing for us all no doubt…

  2. No forced vaccinations, but I wonder whether a person who *knows* that they have a fatal infectious disease ought to be liable for (an equivalent of) criminal assault for intentionally exposing others. It seems to me that that’s a rational legal position, which would certainly be an “inducement” for those infected to be very cautious.
    I wondered the same thing about AIDS, after reading about the “prime source”, who intentionally (or with total disregard) infected hundreds of others.
    Of course, the Swine Flu hysteria is vastly overblown. There isn’t a communicable disease in the world that isn’t now a “worldwide” threat. But the scientific fact is that N1H1 is *far less* threatening than normal flu (almost totally “asymptomatic” in the jargon). People never “die” from the flu, they die from other illnesses or pre-existing conditions that are simply exacerbated.

  3. Noto, I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Not being obsessed with ridiculous conspiracy theories doesn’t mean you can’t be concerned about real issues.

    As for Swine Flu, I now know dozens who have had it. For most it lasted about 48 hours and was pretty mild.


  4. Simply wish to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is simply nice and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the rewarding work.

  5. I have observed that over the course of developing a relationship with real estate owners, you’ll be able to come to understand that, in each and every real estate transaction, a payment is paid. All things considered, FSBO sellers never “save” the commission payment. Rather, they try to earn the commission simply by doing a great agent’s task. In the process, they spend their money in addition to time to complete, as best they’re able to, the obligations of an agent. Those obligations include disclosing the home by means of marketing, presenting the home to buyers, constructing a sense of buyer emergency in order to trigger an offer, booking home inspections, taking on qualification assessments with the loan company, supervising fixes, and facilitating the closing of the deal.

  6. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not already Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.