Can the States Stop the Stimulus Bill?

I feel almost guilty about the title of this article because by the time I was finished with the research it was clear that the answer was probably no. At one point it looked like there was hope that a group of governors would stand up against irrational and dangerous federal spending and refuse to accept money (and the strings attached to it) from the so-called stimulus plan, but as we get close to the passage of the bill that hope seems to be fading.

When the TARP bill passed and there was discussion of an additional stimuls bill there was a lot of murmuring among governors and state legislators about any money for the states coming with mandates attached which would burden the states with future spending and interference from the feds. Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina who is associated with the libertarian-leaning Republican Liberty Caucus led the opposition and spoke out against the federal spending package on states rights principles. Surprisingly rumors and speculation were strong in Texas that Governor Rick Perry would also reject federal stimulus money, with the strength of a relatively healthy economy behind him. Other governors expressing concern and potential opposition to the stimuls bill included Sarah Palin of Alaska, Haley Barbour of Mississippi and Bobby Jindal of Louisiana. With Sanford as head of the Republican Governor’s Association there was some hope that he might swing that group behind a boycott of federal money. He would certainly have popular support for such a campaign, with calls to congressional offices running hundreds to one against the bill and influential fiscal responsibility group Americans for Prosperity circulating a petition against the “no stimulus” bill which is getting a lot of publicity.

But there’s a reason why the bill includes so much money for certain special interest groups. It’s not a coincidence that it includes billions for unscrupulous grassroots organizations like ACORN and tens of billions of earmarks for educational programs to win the support of the powerful teachers unions. Lobbyists for the construction and auto industries and for the educational establishment have really turned up the pressure in DC and at state legislatures to make sure that they get their share of the spending bonanza. The United Federation of Teachers even bussed teachers and their students to DC to show their support at the capitol. The NEA which is the largest of the teachers unions really pulled out the all the stops with lobbying and letterwriting campaigns to remind legislators nationwide who can turn out the votes and the money to get them reelected.

The result is that by this week it looks like any hope that governors will be able to block the spending bill and refuse federal money and the interference and further federal control that comes with it is fading away. State legislators in Texas were up in arms and wanted their money and were looking for a way to end-run the governor and take the federal funds without his approval. The key fight came in South Carolina where Governor Sanford wanted to stick with this principles but was struggling because of budget problems and high unemployment. He made his position on the issue very clear when he summed up the essence of the problem with the stimulus bill in the Wall Street Journal:

“Federal appetites may know no bounds. But the federal government’s ability to borrow is not limitless. Already, our nation’s unfunded liabilities total $52 trillion — about $450,000 per household. There’s something very strange about issuing debt to solve a problem caused by too much debt.”

Not wanting to miss their ride on the gravy train, South Carolina legislators took the decision out of his hands by getting their man in DC, house majority whip Jim Clyburn to add a provision to the stimulus bill which will allow state legislatures to authorize spending of federal funds if they don’t get gubernatorial approval within 45 days of passage. Clyburn has no love for Sanford and his addition to the bill was clearly intended as a political rebuke to Sanford and the states-rights principles he stands for.

This provision in the stimulus bill basically means that even if governors oppose the stimulus package and want to block it, they will have no voice in the process. So now all of the governors who might have opposed the massive imposition of federal spending and obligations on their states are powerless. The implications for the future are ominous, because if this bill stands as a precedent it transfers a huge amount of power away from state governments and to the congress, taking away any ability of states to determine their own fiscal policies when federal funds are involved.

The inclusion of this rule is troubling because there is very little question that it is blatantly unconstitutional and a clear violation of the 10th Amendment. It’s a big stretch interpret the constitution to allow for the Congress to force money on the states and then force them to accept federal government dictates on how to spend that money. This creates a situation reminiscent of the case in Schechter Poultry vs. the United States where the Supreme Court struck down the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 for giving powers to the federal government which were not granted to it constitutionally. It may also run afoul of the ruling in New York vs. the United States which ruled that it was unconstitutional for the federal government to force state governments to act as its agents. The passage of the stimulus bill with this inclusion may lead to legal challenges from some states and legal rights groups. If it does not, the danger of the precedent it will set in weakening state autonomy is frightening.

So the bad news is that despite the best efforts of a few heroes like Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina, craven state legislators and power-hungry Democrats in Congress have assured that the massive stimulus spending will go into effect over the objection of concerned governors. In doing this Congress may well have precipitated a constitutional crisis and it is clear that the last remaining hope for those who want fiscally responsible government and oppose this massive deficit spending bill lies with legal challenges in the courts, and ultimately on the slender hope that the Supreme Court will block this massive expansion of federal power and affirm the validity of the 10th Amendment.

Digg!

About Dave 536 Articles
Dave Nalle has worked as a magazine editor, a freelance writer, a capitol hill staffer, a game designer and taught college history for many years. He now designs fonts for a living and lives with his family in a small town just outside Austin where he is ex-president of the local Lions Club. He is on the board of the Republican Liberty Caucus and Politics Editor of Blogcritics Magazine. You can find his writings about fonts, art and graphic design at The Scriptorium. He also runs a conspiracy debunking site at IdiotWars.com.

25 Comments

  1. This is a great followup to your earlier article and I hope it gets even more attention. It’s depressing as hell and I want to strangle Clyburn for betraying the nation this way. Something has to be done. This shit needs to stop.

  2. Tempting though it may be, I wouldn’t recommend strangling legislators.

    I think the Clyburn-Sanford conflict is interesting because it may help propel Sanford into a presidential campaign in 2012, which would be a very good thing.

    Dave

  3. you know, state sovereignty was a big part of the Civil War. Perhaps Obama really DOES want to be just like Lincoln.

  4. You really make it appear really easy with your presentation however I find this matter to be really one thing that I believe I might never understand. It kind of feels too complex and extremely huge for me. I am looking forward to your next publish, I will attempt to get the hold of it!

  5. Whats Going down i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It absolutely useful and it has aided me out loads. I’m hoping to contribute & aid other users like its aided me. Great job.

  6. I think this is among the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The site style is ideal, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  7. I just wanted to jot down a brief word to express gratitude to you for all of the precious suggestions you are sharing at this website. My long internet lookup has at the end of the day been compensated with reliable strategies to go over with my family and friends. I would point out that we website visitors are undoubtedly endowed to exist in a decent network with so many outstanding people with very helpful solutions. I feel very much privileged to have discovered your web site and look forward to really more pleasurable minutes reading here. Thanks once more for a lot of things.

  8. I precisely needed to say thanks yet again. I’m not certain the things I might have undertaken in the absence of those pointers revealed by you on my concern. It had been an absolute troublesome condition in my opinion, but taking note of the well-written strategy you managed the issue took me to weep with fulfillment. Now i’m happier for the service and have high hopes you know what an amazing job you have been getting into training many people thru your blog post. I am certain you’ve never encountered any of us.

  9. Hi, thanks for pointing the latest Ubuntu release. IT is one of the coolest releases and i have it installed on my computer at home. the only issue is outdated ati driver.

  10. I have been surfing on-line more than 3 hours these days, but I by no means discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the internet will probably be a lot more useful than ever before.

  11. You can certainly see your skills in the work you write. The arena hopes for more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. At all times go after your heart. “He never is alone that is accompanied with noble thoughts.” by Fletcher.

  12. Something more important is that when looking for a good online electronics shop, look for web shops that are regularly updated, always keeping up-to-date with the hottest products, the perfect deals, plus helpful information on services and products. This will ensure you are getting through a shop that really stays atop the competition and offers you what you need to make knowledgeable, well-informed electronics buying. Thanks for the crucial tips I have really learned through your blog.

  13. Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So good to seek out anyone with some authentic thoughts on this subject. realy thanks for beginning this up. this website is something that’s wanted on the web, somebody with a little bit originality. helpful job for bringing something new to the internet!

  14. Thank you, I’ve just been searching for information approximately this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I have found out till now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure in regards to the source?

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Free of State » Blog Archive » States are squirming to reclaim 10th amendment rights

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*