August 23, 2011

Ron Paul is Not a Truther

By Dave
Topics:
9/11 Myths

Ron Paul has worked very hard through two presidential campaign seasons to cross the line from being the Republican Party’s token libertarian gadfly to emerging as a legitimate leadership figure with a chance of winning the nomination in 2012. In his quest he has been both helped and hindered by his own followers. On the one hand their devotion to Paul and their enthusiasm are amazing, giving him an edge in fundraising and promotion which none of the other Republicans can match. On the other hand, a fraction of those enthusiastic supporters are just plain nuts and their statements and beliefs have been used against Paul by his critics inside his party, in the other party and in the media.

Ron Paul is in no way responsible for the beliefs and delusions of his followers in the same way that Jodie Foster was not responsible for John Hinckley’s attack on Ronald Reagan. It might be different if he encouraged them or deliberately pandered to them, or shared their more radical obsessions, but he has not done that, and has often made very clear where he disagrees with them. Bizarrely they seem oblivious to this and in many cases are convinced that Dr. Paul shares their beliefs no matter how often he clearly states that he does not.

One striking example of this is his relationship with the 9/11 “truth” movement, the tumultuous cabal of conspiracy fanatics who advocate an assortment of bizarre and contradictory theories about the attack on the World Trade Center, each one more implausible than the last. Many Truthers are outspoken Ron Paul supporters and are absolutely convinced that he agrees with their beliefs, despite all evidence to the contrary. When confronted with direct statements disagreeing with them from Dr. Paul their cognitive dissonance kicks in and they translate what he says into something different which fits their delusions.

In a recent discussion a Truther said to me “I watched a video on national TV where he (Ron Paul) renounced the official version of 9/11 and called for more investigation. He even said that he couldn’t rule out an inside job.” Yet when challenged to produce a video of this statement he could not provide a link to one. What he and other truthers progably actually saw was one of several television interviews like the one below:

In these interviews Paul criticizes the 9/11 investigation, but not on the basis that they came up with the wrong explanation for the attacks. What Paul always focuses on in these interviews is his concern that the investigation did not look at root causes of the attacks in our foreign policy or the incompetence of government agencies which failed to prevent the attacks. Nowhere does he ever support any alternative theory on the 9/11 attacks.

That’s a provocative and potentially controversial position for him to take, but it’s decidedly not the same as advocating or in any way supporting any of the popular conspiracy theories. Paul’s views still fall within the political norm and they don’t in any way endorse any alternate interpretation of the basic facts of the events of 9/11.

Because there is this common perception among his own supporters that he holds beliefs which he seems not to, he ends up being asked about it a lot. Those supporters are delusional, so they pretend his answers denying their movement don’t exist and for his part, Paul seems puzzled and annoyed that the rumors persist, as you can hear in this radio interview:

Paul has even rejected 9/11 conspiracy theories in a presidential debate, early in the 2008 election. But in this case, as often happens, when offered an opportunity to speak directly to his supporters and urge them not to continue to promote delusional ideas which hurt his candidacy dy association, his natural inclination to support free thought and free speech lead him into the error of appearing tolerant of their beliefs. Despite having every reason to whack them on the knuckles and send them to bed without dinner, he’s too tolerant and too nice a guy to be firm with them, even if it may well cost him the presidency again in 2012 as it did in 2008.

A lot of this is a function of wilfull denial of reality, a kind of cognitive dissonance where the truthers are absolutely divorced from reality. In this video truthers ask him about the conspiracy and he gives a reasonable and compelling explanation for why their theories are irrational, because the government is too inept to have actually carried out a conspiracy on that grand scale, and that if anything went on it was just a coverup of government incompetence.

Clearly some people get the mssage, but a core group among his followers won’t accept the truth about 9/11 even from a revered leader like Paul. The response you can see on the message thread which goes with the video shows how delusional his truther followers are. One writes “yeah sure.. he can’t say it was a total inside job even though IT WAS. You have to be cautious about these harsh comments.” Another rationalizes away Paul’s statements saying “I think Paul suspects that it was an inside job too, but he doesn’t want to cross that line, for it would completely ruin his presidential aspirations.”

Even though Paul is clearly rejecting the 9/11 conspiracy theories in these statements, that core group of crazy followers can’t accept the possibility that he disagrees with them and they have convinced themselves that Paul, who they revere for his truthfulness, is lying to protect himself and actually agrees with them no matter how many times he denies it.

There’s no question that Ron Paul’s relationship with the truthers, as with other fringe groups, is a mostly one-sided relationship. They like Paul, but he clearly doesn’t like them very much. He finds himself involuntarily saddled with a cadre of fanatical nuts who follow him around and end up associating themselves with his campaign and no matter what he says and does he can’t get rid of them. They don’t realize they’re dragging him down to defeat by tainting hm with their lunacy and he’s too nice a guy to tell them to go to hell.

It’s really a tragic situation and the irony of it is painful. Inevitably, when the behavior of his followers causes Paul to come up short in his last and greatest campaign in 2012, after the fact those followers will gather over a beer and blame his defeat on the grand conspiracy they also blame for 9/11, never understanding that it was them and their actions which doomed their hero, because they could not bring themselves to shut up and accept reality and listen to what he was actually telling them.

A version of this article originally appeared on Blogcritics.org

17 Responses to “Ron Paul is Not a Truther”

  1. Adam R. Says:
    August 24th, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    Ron Paul has many good ideas that ought to be put into motion. I support auditing the Fed, getting rid of departments that have no constitutional basis and using money tied to precious metals. It’s tough to push the concept of liberty when you have outspoken followers and fundraisers who are more focused on acting like religious paladins slaying the conspiratorial forces of the beast. I’ve seen the Daily Paul website and they tend to hate just about everyone who isn’t Ron Paul. It’s kind of a weird fetish and I’m sure it has to do with some of them having Asperger’s. I’m certainly hoping Paul, Johnson, Perry (I know you aren’t a fan) or Palin (Should she run) get the nomination. Good article.
    -Adam

  2. Joe M. Says:
    December 2nd, 2011 at 3:48 am

    Well written column Dave.

    Adam, I’ve hardly ever checked out the daily Paul website, but your characterization of some of their contributors as “having Aspgergers.” sounds like something that only a dick would come up with. As a person who has to suffer the scourge and misery of Asperger’s Disorder himself day in and day out, I myself found that utterly distasteful.

    -Joe M.

  3. Adam R. Says:
    May 2nd, 2012 at 12:33 am

    Some of the people on the the Ron Paul sites describe themselves as having it. I’m not being the dick here just because of what they call themselves. Scourge and misery from your condition? Go tell that to someone living with something even more serious like AIDS or fibromyalgia. What a drama queen.

  4. Joe M. Says:
    May 8th, 2012 at 4:03 am

    Adam. I wasn’t being a drama queen either. It’s just that that comment seriously hurt me. And I just couldn’t let it pass by unremarked. Thank you sir and have a nice day.

  5. Joe M. Says:
    January 23rd, 2013 at 7:04 am

    Dave, I don’t really mean to digress here, but now that Ron Paul is pretty much long gone as per future U.S. Presidential aspirations, Who, in your opinion would be a suitable pro-liberty candidate (or candidates) in 2016?

  6. Eun Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 11:46 am

    Don’t be tied to your desktop – take your Word – Press blog with your on Windows Phone 7. After you have signed in, find the Options button at the top of the page.

  7. Silvia denti Says:
    November 11th, 2015 at 5:05 am

    Grazie mille, davvero completo buon lavoro

  8. Hubert Buchwalter Says:
    December 14th, 2015 at 5:50 am

    Może to się zgadza ale muszę sprawdzić.

  9. Roxanne Aiuto Says:
    January 22nd, 2016 at 12:13 pm

    in case you continue this in future.

  10. star shower colors Says:
    February 8th, 2016 at 3:44 pm

    I am continuously browsing online for posts that can assist me. Thx!

  11. porno Says:
    June 9th, 2016 at 5:45 am

    http://www.pornogratisdiario.com

  12. Ike Shack Says:
    July 7th, 2016 at 7:50 am

    There are some attention-grabbing deadlines in this article however I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There’s some validity but I will take maintain opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like more! Added to FeedBurner as well

  13. Normand Ariyoshi Says:
    December 4th, 2016 at 4:46 am

    I really like your writing style, wonderful info , appreciate it for putting up : D.

  14. Roberto Scoble Says:
    December 26th, 2016 at 5:55 am

    Fantastic site. Lots of helpful info here. I’m sending it to a few buddies ans additionally sharing in delicious. And obviously, thank you to your sweat!

  15. visit Says:
    February 24th, 2017 at 9:16 am

    I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This paragraph posted at this site is actually pleasant.|

  16. official site Says:
    March 1st, 2017 at 9:13 am

    Just desire to say your article is as amazing. The clarity for your submit is just nice and i can think you’re a professional in this subject. Well with your permission let me to grasp your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please carry on the gratifying work.|

  17. Hilton Tuten Says:
    March 21st, 2017 at 10:13 pm

    I truly enjoy looking through on this site, it holds excellent content . “I have a new philosophy. I’m only going to dread one day at a time.” by Charles M. Schulz.

Comments