Exclusive

• Obama “Economic Stimulus” Isn’t Working

  The Financial Times recently reported these dismal figures for private sector hiring: “Since the stimulus began, about 400,000 public sector jobs have been added (through May 2010) while 2.7 million private sector jobs were lost.” The National Federation of Independent Business has a study showing that small businesses in the United States lost jobs in twelve of the last fourteen months. What is equally disturbing in the NFIB survey is that its small business members have no plans to increase hiring in the foreseeable future. Considering that small businesses are responsible for the creation of a majority of new private sector jobs, this is particularly worrisome.

  One group of employees, however, continues to do well even in these difficult recessionary times. Federal employment has increased by 225,000 since President Obama took office. Moreover, according to USA TODAY, federal workers now earn more than twice as much as employees in the private sector doing comparable jobs.

  For every other sector of the American economy, unemployment remains high, and those who have gone back to work after losing their jobs in this recession often are making less than they were before. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 46 percent of the unemployed have been out of work for 27 weeks or longer. Economist Martin Hutchison notes that long-term unemployment in the U.S. “has reached levels not seen since World War II.”

  All of this data should make it clear to most Americans that the so-called stimulus programs aren’t helping to get Americans back to work. The thrust of these various government spending packages has been to encourage the American consumer to spend more as a means to get us out of this recession. The problem with this approach is that, if the consumer is worried about holding a job, keeping a business going, making mortgage payments on a house, or paying down credit card debt, he or she is going to spend less and save more – which is precisely what is happening.

  That’s why consumer confidence continues to remain weak. In fact, the latest consumer index from the Conference Board for July states that “confidence had hit a five-month low,” down to near the 50 percent range. It was at the 100 percent level a little less than three years ago.

  Scott Burns had it right in a recent column in which he warned of “the idea that government could stimulate demand with deficit spending.” Burns quotes economist Lacy Hunt: “Deficit spending, rather than energizing the economy, is debilitating it. Worse, after the spending is done, the private sector has to service the new debt.”

  If the current policies aren’t effective in putting Americans back to work, then what should we do instead? The key is to provide incentives to get the private sector moving again similar to what we did with the Congressional passage of the Kemp-Roth Job Creation Act in 1981 during President Ronald Reagan’s first term in office. The economic circumstances are different than what we faced back then (government debt is a lot higher), but the concept is similar: How do we encourage savings and capital investment in order to create jobs here in the United States? I would submit that the best way to do that is to replace our corporate tax system and its 35 percent tax rate with an 8 percent revenue-neutral, business consumption tax. That tax would be applicable on goods and services coming into the U.S., while U.S. exports would get a comparable tax credit. This gets rid of our onerous tax on businesses operating here in the U.S., while leveling the playing field with our trading competitors who currently enjoy a huge trade advantage over American exporters.

  Adopting a business consumption tax to replace our current system would reduce the outsourcing of American jobs, encourage long-term investment in U.S. businesses, rebuild our manufacturing base, reduce our trade deficits, and put business owners back in charge of the American economy.
  This is a real economic stimulus plan to get Americans back to work.

  Tom Pauken is the Chairman of the Texas Workforce Commission.

Featured

• Obama “Economic Stimulus” Isn’t Working

  The Financial Times recently reported these dismal figures for private sector hiring: “Since the stimulus began, about 400,000 public sector jobs have been added (through May 2010) while 2.7 million private sector jobs were lost.” The National Federation of Independent Business has a study showing that small businesses in the United States lost jobs in twelve of the last fourteen months. What is equally disturbing in the NFIB survey is that its small business members have no plans to increase hiring in the foreseeable future. Considering that small businesses are responsible for the creation of a majority of new private sector jobs, this is particularly worrisome.

  One group of employees, however, continues to do well even in these difficult recessionary times. Federal employment has increased by 225,000 since President Obama took office. Moreover, according to USA TODAY, federal workers now earn more than twice as much as employees in the private sector doing comparable jobs.

  For every other sector of the American economy, unemployment remains high, and those who have gone back to work after losing their jobs in this recession often are making less than they were before. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 46 percent of the unemployed have been out of work for 27 weeks or longer. Economist Martin Hutchison notes that long-term unemployment in the U.S. “has reached levels not seen since World War II.”

  All of this data should make it clear to most Americans that the so-called stimulus programs aren’t helping to get Americans back to work. The thrust of these various government spending packages has been to encourage the American consumer to spend more as a means to get us out of this recession. The problem with this approach is that, if the consumer is worried about holding a job, keeping a business going, making mortgage payments on a house, or paying down credit card debt, he or she is going to spend less and save more – which is precisely what is happening.

  That’s why consumer confidence continues to remain weak. In fact, the latest consumer index from the Conference Board for July states that “confidence had hit a five-month low,” down to near the 50 percent range. It was at the 100 percent level a little less than three years ago.

  Scott Burns had it right in a recent column in which he warned of “the idea that government could stimulate demand with deficit spending.” Burns quotes economist Lacy Hunt: “Deficit spending, rather than energizing the economy, is debilitating it. Worse, after the spending is done, the private sector has to service the new debt.”

  If the current policies aren’t effective in putting Americans back to work, then what should we do instead? The key is to provide incentives to get the private sector moving again similar to what we did with the Congressional passage of the Kemp-Roth Job Creation Act in 1981 during President Ronald Reagan’s first term in office. The economic circumstances are different than what we faced back then (government debt is a lot higher), but the concept is similar: How do we encourage savings and capital investment in order to create jobs here in the United States? I would submit that the best way to do that is to replace our corporate tax system and its 35 percent tax rate with an 8 percent revenue-neutral, business consumption tax. That tax would be applicable on goods and services coming into the U.S., while U.S. exports would get a comparable tax credit. This gets rid of our onerous tax on businesses operating here in the U.S., while leveling the playing field with our trading competitors who currently enjoy a huge trade advantage over American exporters.

  Adopting a business consumption tax to replace our current system would reduce the outsourcing of American jobs, encourage long-term investment in U.S. businesses, rebuild our manufacturing base, reduce our trade deficits, and put business owners back in charge of the American economy.
  This is a real economic stimulus plan to get Americans back to work.

  Tom Pauken is the Chairman of the Texas Workforce Commission.

• It’s Time for New Strategies at the NRSC

  Many years ago I worked for the National Republican Senatorial Committee as a low-level flunky doing what takes up about 90% of their efforts: raising money. They work very hard at raising money, are very good at it and raise millions of dollars to spend on Republican senatorial campaigns. That's why they exist.
  Yet [...]

• Libertarian Wayne Root to Larry King: Yes, Abolish Social Security

  Republicans who defend SS risk losing votes to Libertarian, Tea PartyFrom Eric Dondero:While mainline Republicans are defending Medicare and Social Security, a growing number of disaffected Tea Party Patriots and Libertarians are saying “hold on a min…

Recent Comments

• Democrats Commit To Hiking Gas Taxes, Stalling Economy
  • Fratricide: did MQS point out that Craddick had appointed Swinford chairman when he bottled up all of Leo's immigration bills in committee in 2007?
• More Quote of the Day Honorable Mention, Part 90
  • Natch Greyes: Not a staffer. And, your interpretation of what I said is a gross mischaracterization. If you want to know why please visit my blog: http://natchgreyes.com/blog/2010/08/mark-whittington-is-an-idiot/ Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/08/12/morning-must-reads-crunching-the-numbers/#ixzz0wPOMLShs
• Jennifer Harper: Mean and Meaner
  • Isaac Gonzalez: maybe in the near future there would be natural breast implants that are based on stem cells or something*`'
• Meet Democrat Keith Halloran, Death-Wisher of the Day
  • Evelyn: Tell Keith Halloran to go and f.... himself.
• Rebuke from Miller Farms
  • Clark Bufkin: Regarding AARP’s fall from grace: AARP has not fallen from grace. They continue to stand for the American ideals of our fore parents and they keep current with today’s issues for…
• Bernie Quigley: Katie Couric mocked Sarah Palin’s children
  • Bernie Quigley: I appreciate your site and I appreciate your posting my essay. But the Couric clip was posted on You Tube without a publish date so I incorrectly assumed it was from this week…
• Left Hook to Voters?
  • kohler: The 11 most populous states contain 56% of the population of the United States and a candidate would win the Presidency if 100% of the voters in these 11 states voted for one…

Featured Video

News 8 Austin

• Arts Minute: Austin, a festival city
• Austin leaders plan improvements for highway to ABIA
• Samsung donates $1 million to United Way program

Ft. Worth Star Telegram

• An election rap from Rick Perry's "son"
• Miller wary of drilling in Dallas
• White calls for term limits on governor's office
• Tarrant may send voting machines to Houston
• Barton: GOP plans tougher oversight of Obama (UPDATED)

Travis Monitor

• Dope Smokers and Sanctuary City Supporters Put More Blood on Their Hands
• Americans for Prosperity Respond to Attack from President Bully Obama
• AN END-ZONE DANCE ON AMERICANS’ GRAVES

The Next Right

• Why Lisa Murkowski Lost
• New York State of Mindlessness
• Modernizing Government: A Renewed Focus on Innovative Solutions

Texas Insider

• Oil Platform Xxplosion Reported in Gulf of Mexico
• Business Leaders Explain How to Create Jobs: Arthur B. Laffer
• Border Security, Budget and Redistricting Updates
• Poll: Ariz. Voters Favor Immigration Enforcement
• A Rocky Mountain Showdown

Austin American Statesman

Meta

• Register
• Log in
• Entries RSS
• Comments RSS
• WordPress.org