Exclusive
-
Obama “Economic Stimulus” Isn’t Working
The Financial Times recently reported these dismal figures for private sector hiring: “Since the stimulus began, about 400,000 public sector jobs have been added (through May 2010) while 2.7 million private sector jobs were lost.” The National Federation of Independent Business has a study showing that small businesses in the United States lost jobs in twelve of the last fourteen months. What is equally disturbing in the NFIB survey is that its small business members have no plans to increase hiring in the foreseeable future. Considering that small businesses are responsible for the creation of a majority of new private sector jobs, this is particularly worrisome.
One group of employees, however, continues to do well even in these difficult recessionary times. Federal employment has increased by 225,000 since President Obama took office. Moreover, according to USA TODAY, federal workers now earn more than twice as much as employees in the private sector doing comparable jobs.
For every other sector of the American economy, unemployment remains high, and those who have gone back to work after losing their jobs in this recession often are making less than they were before. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 46 percent of the unemployed have been out of work for 27 weeks or longer. Economist Martin Hutchison notes that long-term unemployment in the U.S. “has reached levels not seen since World War II.”
All of this data should make it clear to most Americans that the so-called stimulus programs aren’t helping to get Americans back to work. The thrust of these various government spending packages has been to encourage the American consumer to spend more as a means to get us out of this recession. The problem with this approach is that, if the consumer is worried about holding a job, keeping a business going, making mortgage payments on a house, or paying down credit card debt, he or she is going to spend less and save more – which is precisely what is happening.
That’s why consumer confidence continues to remain weak. In fact, the latest consumer index from the Conference Board for July states that “confidence had hit a five-month low,” down to near the 50 percent range. It was at the 100 percent level a little less than three years ago.
Scott Burns had it right in a recent column in which he warned of “the idea that government could stimulate demand with deficit spending.” Burns quotes economist Lacy Hunt: “Deficit spending, rather than energizing the economy, is debilitating it. Worse, after the spending is done, the private sector has to service the new debt.”
If the current policies aren’t effective in putting Americans back to work, then what should we do instead? The key is to provide incentives to get the private sector moving again similar to what we did with the Congressional passage of the Kemp-Roth Job Creation Act in 1981 during President Ronald Reagan’s first term in office. The economic circumstances are different than what we faced back then (government debt is a lot higher), but the concept is similar: How do we encourage savings and capital investment in order to create jobs here in the United States? I would submit that the best way to do that is to replace our corporate tax system and its 35 percent tax rate with an 8 percent revenue-neutral, business consumption tax. That tax would be applicable on goods and services coming into the U.S., while U.S. exports would get a comparable tax credit. This gets rid of our onerous tax on businesses operating here in the U.S., while leveling the playing field with our trading competitors who currently enjoy a huge trade advantage over American exporters.
Adopting a business consumption tax to replace our current system would reduce the outsourcing of American jobs, encourage long-term investment in U.S. businesses, rebuild our manufacturing base, reduce our trade deficits, and put business owners back in charge of the American economy.
This is a real economic stimulus plan to get Americans back to work.Tom Pauken is the Chairman of the Texas Workforce Commission.
Featured
-
Nye Elected RLC National Chair at 2013 Biennial Convention
AUSTIN, TX (5/12/13) – Florida IT consultant Matt Nye of Melbourne, FL was elected National Chair of the Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC). He will serve through 2015. The RLC is the nation’s oldest grassroots organization of the Liberty Republican wing of the GOP. State chapters from Alaska to Florida and from California to Maine gathered [...]
-
Obama vs. Romney: The Houston Money
South Texas Daily – News, Opinion and Politics from South Texas by Paul Gable
Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s campaign raised nearly twice as much money in the greater Houston area than that of President Barack Obama – most of it from wealthier upscale communities – but more people overall contributed to the president’s re-election, according to aHouston Chronicle analysis of campaign contributions.
See an interactive map of donors here.
Though Romney’s numbers are hardly surprising in a Republican-dominated state, the money trail reflects both the political diversity of the Houston region and the two candidates’ eclectic support in the nation’s fourth-largest city.
The post Obama vs. Romney: The Houston Money appeared first on South Texas Daily.
-
Rose Vela exits chief justice race
South Texas Daily – News, Opinion and Politics from South Texas by Paul Gable
Republican Party leaders expressed disappointment over Justice Rose Vela’s decision to withdraw from the race for chief justice of the 13th Court of Appeals given the bid by her husband, Democrat Filemon Vela, for the District 34 U.S. congressional seat.
Justice Vela, 47, of Corpus Christi, asked Secretary of State Hope Andrade on Aug. 21 to drop her name from the November General Election ballot. Justice Vela had been unopposed in the Republican Party primary.
“I appreciate the tremendous opportunity I have had to serve the citizens of Texas over the last 14 years and I look forward to my private practice,” Justice Vela, who serves in Place 2 on the appellate court, said in a written statement Friday.
The post Rose Vela exits chief justice race appeared first on South Texas Daily.
Recent Comments
- A Clear Choice in 34th Congressional District
- Reuters calls Mexico's socialist, Fidel Castro-aligned PRI "centrists"
- Is South Africa headed towards Civil War?
- anthony d' alpoim manesa: well the farmers need to organized and turn they farms into kibbutz like Israel .first they must bring more boere from the squatter camps. each farm should have at least 50 people…
- Adriana Stuijt: There's something wrong with the statistics of land-ownership facts in this story. By Nov 2011, the ANC-regime owned 65,000 of the 85,000 farms registered as 'white owned' in 1996. Thus there cannot be…
- Rebuke from Miller Farms
- AMERICANS FIRST: NeNeT... all I can say to you is PIFFLE. You sound like a jealous old woman... jealous of the Millers who have worked hard and are successful. People like you want the successful…
- betty: BOO HOO ... TO THE writer spouting off about how the letter insulting his heritage .... that's usually the feeling of all illegal immigrants... that letter is not condeming legal immigrants ... who…
- Americans Elect: Nomination process dissapoints
Featured Video
One Response to “Americans Elect: Nomination process dissapoints”
Leave a Comment
Ft. Worth Star Telegram
- Fort Worth runoff update: Paz, Bivens, Ramos win
- Fort Worth District 5 candidate Gyna Bivens raises $49,960 in April, $43,000 from cops
- Tarrant County cities' sales tax allocations up 7.26 percent in June
- Moss raises $16,405, spends $21,332, in May for Fort Worth city council runoff
- Lowrider group raising donations for Oklahoma storm victims






The problem with Americans Elect is its defective concept. The premise that they could start by nominating a candidate for president reflects a form of reality blindness and historical ignorance. They expected that they would attract a stellar politician to carry their banner and attract a large portion of the independent voters. The only “declared” candidates, i.e. “willing”, are political failures or unknowns who have attracted fewer supporters than a small town city council candidate. Why would they expect anything different?
A stellar politician who would attract millions of voters would know that it is politically and mathematically impossible to win the presidency as a third party candidate in our dominant two-party history with the winner-take-all electoral system. The only thing a third party candidate could do would be to act as a spoiler, splitting the vote of his own party, Republican or Democrat, so the other party’s candidate would win. No stellar politician would want to be the cause of that “treachery” to his party compatriots.
If, by some miracle the AE candidate won, how could he ever accomplish anything as president? He would have no AE members in Congress to work with him. Every member of Congress would be in the opposition party, with his former party members hating him even more than the members of the other opposing party.
The only reason Buddy Roemer is seeking the nomination is that he has had a failed political career and could never expect to be elected to anything again. To learn the truth about him, go to the following web page and then scroll down the comments to the comment of “Say Amen.” Read the citations that have been assembled there. They are excellent sources of information about Buddy Roemer, written by independent, objective, and reliable journalists and historians.
http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2012/04/buddy-roemer-says-he-has-list-of-23-vice-presidential-possibilities/