Americans Elect: Nomination process dissapoints

By Eric Dondero

by Clifford F. Thies

With one day left for on-line voting, already extended one week, the Americans Elect Party nomination process has fallen far short of expectations. In first place in terms of votes, but merely a "draft candidate," is Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, with 9,232 votes. In second place is former Louisiana Governor Buddy Roemer, with 5,512 votes. In third and fourth places are former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman (another draft candidate) and former Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson.

Among other things complicating the process are (uno) the rules require 100,000 votes (with a distribution requirement) and, yet, nobody has even 10,000 votes; (dos) what does the party do if the winner is merely a draft candidate? and (tres) last week, Buddy Roemer announced that he would withdraw from the race if he didn't have a chance of winning and what does the party do about that?

In the meanwhile, Americans Elect continue to piles up petition signatures for ballot status. Already second only to the Libertarian Party in states for which the party's candidate will appear on the ballot, Americans Elect has recently completed its petitioning drives in three states and is currently active in several more.

One Response to “Americans Elect: Nomination process dissapoints”

  1. Say Amen

    The problem with Americans Elect is its defective concept. The premise that they could start by nominating a candidate for president reflects a form of reality blindness and historical ignorance. They expected that they would attract a stellar politician to carry their banner and attract a large portion of the independent voters. The only “declared” candidates, i.e. “willing”, are political failures or unknowns who have attracted fewer supporters than a small town city council candidate. Why would they expect anything different?

    A stellar politician who would attract millions of voters would know that it is politically and mathematically impossible to win the presidency as a third party candidate in our dominant two-party history with the winner-take-all electoral system. The only thing a third party candidate could do would be to act as a spoiler, splitting the vote of his own party, Republican or Democrat, so the other party’s candidate would win. No stellar politician would want to be the cause of that “treachery” to his party compatriots.

    If, by some miracle the AE candidate won, how could he ever accomplish anything as president? He would have no AE members in Congress to work with him. Every member of Congress would be in the opposition party, with his former party members hating him even more than the members of the other opposing party.

    The only reason Buddy Roemer is seeking the nomination is that he has had a failed political career and could never expect to be elected to anything again. To learn the truth about him, go to the following web page and then scroll down the comments to the comment of “Say Amen.” Read the citations that have been assembled there. They are excellent sources of information about Buddy Roemer, written by independent, objective, and reliable journalists and historians.
    http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2012/04/buddy-roemer-says-he-has-list-of-23-vice-presidential-possibilities/

    #3694

Leave a Comment